goodgold88
Joined: 17-Apr-2019
Posts: 4
Posted: 17-Apr-2019, 18:23
#
Edited: 17-Apr-2019, 18:26
Posted: 17-Apr-2019, 18:23
#
Edited: 17-Apr-2019, 18:26
Hello there.
I managed to get such a nice coin.
2 Dukat Carl XI , City of Reval, 1672 year.
weight : 6,97g
gold 986
I would like to know if it is the real one and if it turns to be a good one then what’s the value of my coin.
thank you!
PetrusAscanus
Joined: 22-Nov-2014
Posts: 6304
Posted: 17-Apr-2019, 23:42
#
Posted: 17-Apr-2019, 23:42
#
Welcome to Numista!!
A real one of that date would be manually hammered.
Yours is milled.
So not that old.
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
goodgold88
Joined: 17-Apr-2019
Posts: 4
Posted: 17-Apr-2019, 23:52
#
Posted: 17-Apr-2019, 23:52
#
Thanks.
What could be the value of my coin then?:)
PetrusAscanus
Joined: 22-Nov-2014
Posts: 6304
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:37
#
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:37
#
Did you had it tested for gold?
Please ask
https://www.kuenker.de/en
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
goodgold88
Joined: 17-Apr-2019
Posts: 4
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:39
#
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:39
#
Quote: "PetrusAscanus"Did you had it tested for gold?
Please ask https://www.kuenker.de/en
yes ofc.
986 gold for sure
PetrusAscanus
Joined: 22-Nov-2014
Posts: 6304
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:46
#
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:46
#
Quote: "goodgold88"
Quote: "PetrusAscanus"Did you had it tested for gold?
Please ask https://www.kuenker.de/en
yes ofc.
986 gold for sure
I took a look at the coinpicture enlarged.
I have now some doubts about the milled coin.
The coin has very beautiful details!
I could not find that coin with that date in any catalog...
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
goodgold88
Joined: 17-Apr-2019
Posts: 4
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:49
#
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:49
#
Quote: "PetrusAscanus"
Quote: "goodgold88"
Quote: "PetrusAscanus"Did you had it tested for gold?
Please ask https://www.kuenker.de/en
yes ofc.
986 gold for sure
I took a look at the coinpicture enlarged.
I have now some doubts about the milled coin.
The coin has very beautiful details!
I could not find that coin with that date in any catalog...
Exactly...
could be very rare? Or something?
damn..
PetrusAscanus
Joined: 22-Nov-2014
Posts: 6304
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:58
#
Posted: 18-Apr-2019, 10:58
#
hihihi LOL
Can you make some pictures of the edge/rim?
thanks
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
Sulfur
Joined: 11-Jun-2016
Posts: 3690
Posted: 19-Apr-2019, 16:19
#
Posted: 19-Apr-2019, 16:19
#
In 1672, the only gold coins struck in Reval were 5 dukat pieces, and as Petrus said, they were hammered. With that being said, your coin could still be made of gold--it could very well be a bullion piece--but this would not be a genuine piece from Reval.
Used time zone is UTC+1:00.
Current time is 00:10.