1 Duit (Zeeland) 1752

On the 1 Duit - Zeeland page, it notes:

*KM#152.2 1726 t/m 1751: Date below the VOC monogram.
*KM#152.3 1752 t/m 1794: Date between the VOC monogram.

I'm not sure if there is a reference somewhere stipulating those dates, but I have a 1752 coin with the date fully below the VOC monogram.

I thought I'd post here first to get an idea if anyone else has a reference for these please? I know there are a lot of variants, and if the entry didn't specify the dates on those two lines, I wouldn't have thought twice about it.

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces7593.html

I have questions about the notes on that page.
KM# 152.2 1726 t/m 1751: Date below the VOC monogram
KM# 152.3 1752 t/m 1794: Date between the VOC monogram

What does t/m mean ?
What is KM# 152.1 description ?
What is 1794 KM# ?

In the year list:
KM# 152.1 is 1729 to 1735
KM# 152.2 is 1736 to 1752 [not 1726 to 1751] [your coin]
KM# 152.3 is 1753 to 1792 [not 1752 to 1794]

All that is just me looking at that page. No catalogues, nothing.
Anyone know what to change on there?

Citation: "ZacUK"​​KM# 152.2 1726 t/m 1751: Date below the VOC monogram
​KM# 152.3 1752 t/m 1794: Date between the VOC monogram
​
​What does t/m mean ?

​Obviously written by a Dutch speaking person:
t/m is the abbreviation of "tot en met" and means "from ... till ... included":
1752 tot en met 1794: from 1752 till 1794 included
1752 tot 1794: from 1752 till 1793 (1794 not included)

Citation: "ZacUK"In the comments sector:
KM# 152.2 1726 t/m 1751: Date below the VOC monogram
KM# 152.3 1752 t/m 1794: Date between the VOC monogram

In the year list:
KM# 152.1 is 1729 to 1735
KM# 152.2 is 1736 to 1752 [not 1726 to 1751] [your coin]
KM# 152.3 is 1753 to 1792 [not 1752 to 1794]

The description in the comments sector doesn't match the descriptions of the KM# references in the year lines. It also explains the confusion of the OP. His coin doesn't match the description in the comments sector, but it does match with the description in the year line.

The description in the comments sector should be corrected!

Thank you!

I had copied the link to the page but then forgot to include it in the post!

And thank you for clarifying. I think it was the lack of description of km 152.1 that tricked me actually. I read the comments, and I did go down to the year list and even I saw .2 next to mine I thought "that goes with the second comment line".

Odd thinking possibly but I think that's where my head was. Meanwhile, I'm glad we resolved my coin, now we just need to work out the comments on the coin page...

Thanks again for your help!

Citation: "ZacUK"What is KM# 152.1 description ?

© Heritage Auctions Europe

The coins in the red frame are KM# 152.1, the others are KM# 152.2. Unfortunately, I don't see the difference. Maybe someone else does?

Citation: "ZacUK"​What is 1794 KM# ?

​

The only Zeeland Duit 1794 I can find is KM# 159, not KM# 152!
The 1794 coins all have a garland on top of the reverse:


© Stack's & Bowers

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces11332.html

@Essor Prof
Thanks!

Perhaps someone has a 1794 without a garland on top?

Maybe
KM# 152.1 is 1729 to 1735 = the V is thicker / base of shield rounded
KM# 152.2 is 1736 to 1752 = the V is thinner / base of shield pointed slightly