Hi, I found this year's ago and I've been wondering if anyone can tell me if I'm write or not. I've been told that the $2 is just a badly damaged coin, but I think it was on the one cent ram. As you can see there's lines in the lettering in the date and in the edge of the reverse.
The one cent is to show the size difference and the position of where the possibility that it did go through the two rams. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Mal.
Those lines in the lettering and the date are from automatic coin packaging machines. They collect the right number of coins and wrap them in a paper roll for easier transport. At the end the machine hits the coin and makes those lines.
If a cent coin would have been stuck between the dollar coin and the die, it would leave a lot more traces than only some lines…
Those lines in the lettering and the date are from automatic coin packaging machines. They collect the right number of coins and wrap them in a paper roll for easier transport. At the end the machine hits the coin and makes those lines.
If a cent coin would have been stuck between the dollar coin and the die, it would leave a lot more traces than only some lines…
Hi thanks for your reply, so if it's from a coin rolling machine isn't that done at the mint? And if so wouldn't there be a lot more coins out there like this one? If you have a look at the $2 from 1988 both sides of the coin are raised of the planchet more than any other $2 coins that I've seen. I'm no a collector I found these in the wife's money box when I got bored during look down.
When you look at these side by side you can see similar damage starting to get worse.
Hi Mike, as I said I found these in the wife's money box. Some of them have been in there for 20 year's plus. All are from the spare change before the bank card took over. Thanks for your time Mal.
Hi thanks for your reply, so if it's from a coin rolling machine isn't that done at the mint? And if so wouldn't there be a lot more coins out there like this one?
There a plenty examples! But I can't show you any because a serious collector (and I like to think I'm a serious collector 😉) tends to avoid them because they are so obviously damaged…
Hi Mike, as a serious collector what causes the damage to the obverse side but not to the reverse side. Also one of my pop's old coins I've noticed that one side of the ribbon doesn't touch the wheat stalks is that common?
Also I have 2, 1972 5c pieces after 50 years would there be many left out there and if not would it be worth keeping them or selling them?. Thanks Mal.
Hi Mike, thanks again. Last question so the two lines on the obverse of the 2014 coin is common is it? Why is it only on the one side. Surely when the coins are ejected from the die and go into the pile for the rolling machine, they don't all get rolled in the same order. And why don't they line up under the queen. Thanks again Mal.
Those lines on the 2014 coin are definitely PMD probably created by a coin rolling machine that Chubb or Armaguard use to roll up $50 worth of $2 coins.
Mike
Master Referee - See my profile for what I collect.