Overstruck and countermarked coins

12 messages

Ce message a été posté dans le forum anglais.

» Accès direct au dernier message

Here's an interesting duo I picked up recently,

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces35900.html
overstruck with
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces74311.html

the overstrike coin is definitely dated 1709. The original coin cut off the date, but if I had to make an educated guess off of the bottom edge of the numbers, I'd guess 1654

Curious what overstruck/counterstruck/etc coins y'all have?
I have this Irish 1 Penny which the reverse was overstruck with Britannia,
but underneath is a wheel ...


https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces80767.html

and my guess is it was originally the obverse of an unused one of these ...
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces42264.html
which is also an Irish 1 Penny, and the original is 1813 then overstruck in 1814. Maybe.
Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
For a collector of overstrikes, it could be very interesting.
Nice find and nice coin!
Here some better contrast:
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
Oops, I put this in the wrong section last night (I blame the whiskey). Can someone with power move it over to free discussion please?

Edit: Thanks!
Discussion déplacée vers "Free discussion" (ZacUK, 4 oct 2018, 19h59)
Zak, is that penny intentional or a mint error? Pretty cool being from two different countries

Here's another one I got recently. I got a small lot of them uncleaned, this was by far the nicest.


https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces68083.html
I think countermarked coins are very interesting, but I only own one. It is also my only coin from Brazil, the 40 Réis. This is a very common coin.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3974.html

I found this interesting one on sale on the internet, but did not buy it:
Finnish 10 Penniä 1865 countermarked "RIIHI"

Riihi means a Finnish/Scandinavian/Russian building where wheat was dried and threshed.
Still there are lots of these buildings in the rural areas of Finland.
Citation: "sc.rednek"​Zak, is that penny intentional or a mint error? Pretty cool being from two different countries

:) Thanks - and they are both from Ireland; the original is from 1813 and maybe too
many were made and some were re-struck intentionally later on to make the 1814 (1816) penny. I just now made this rough animation in which the wheel just about matches ...

................................................ ​ ...............................................
So I guess not enough pressure was used in the re-strike to obliterate all of what was originally underneath. The obverse looks alright so it was just the design coming through on the reverse.


P.S. I tried that with your first images but not as easy as they were re-struck at different
angles so the design does not appear in about the same place ...
................................................ ............................................. 8)
Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
I don't collect countermarks, so to me personally, they might as well be PMD. Thus I often avoid them, and don't have many in my collection (although I might make a future exception for an otherwise scarce coin).

But here's one from my early days of collecting; a 1807 George III halfpenny with a "£" countermark (I think) upside down on the obverse:

I got the overstruck spanish ardite of Carlo III too but mine is as ugly as possible :O.

Multiple strikes with the same pattern on the reverse side of an indo-Sassanian drachm :



_________________________

A Mamluk dirham of the sultan al-Nasir Muhammad overstrucked on a Cilician Armenia takvorin of Levon (IV ?).


Host coin : https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces45882.html

_________________________

A Mamluk fals of the sultan al-Salih Salih overstrucked on ???



Host coin : Ayyubid or mamluk fals ?
New one : https://fr.numista.com/catalogue/pieces142363.html

_________________________

A Mamluk fals of the sultan al-Ashraf Sha'ban minted at Tripoli and overstrucked on another fals of this sultan (same mint) :


Host coin : with the fleur-de-lys
New one : https://fr.numista.com/catalogue/pieces142657.html

_________________________

Sol tampé minted for the french colonies struck on a double sol of Louis XV (year 1749).


Host coin : https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces15113.html
New coin : https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces7571.html

I got few more from the mamluk sultanate but I didn't manage to identify them yet.

@Cass
I thought the countermark on your coin was a gun or something like that at first :P
Citation: "Cycnos"​@Cass
​I thought the countermark on your coin was a gun or something like that at first :P
​Well, I'm not 100% sure it's a pound sign either, so who knows? Maybe someone really didn't like George III back in the day. :°

I just remembered I also have a Spanish/Mexican 8 reales coin of Carlos IV that bears quite a few chopmarks; mostly from East Asian merchants, to ensure validity.
Citation: "CassTaylor"

​I just remembered I also have a Spanish/Mexican 8 reales coin of Carlos IV that bears quite a few chopmarks; mostly from East Asian merchants, to ensure validity.
​Picture?
Citation: "sc.rednek"
Citation: "CassTaylor"
​​
​​I just remembered I also have a Spanish/Mexican 8 reales coin of Carlos IV that bears quite a few chopmarks; mostly from East Asian merchants, to ensure validity.
​​
​​Picture?
​Whoops, forgot to attach it:

There's a couple of flower chopmarks on the neck of the bust, plus a few distinct Chinese characters (考 is visible in the field in front of his face).

» Charte d'utilisation du forum

Le fuseau horaire utilisé est UTC+2:00.
L'heure actuelle est 11h20.